|

| |
Monosodium chloride FAQs
Many have asked whether monosodium chloride is dangerous or not. This page of
FAQs and the accompanying MSDS are being published to answer these thorny
questions and to suggest what governments may wish to do to resolve the issue.
Monosodium chloride (MSC) is a common, toxic material, which
governments have chosen to ignore in terms of protection of the population. It
has a synonym, sodium monochloride.
MSC may be produced by reacting chlorine with sodium. Sodium is
a highly reactive metal which can burst into flames in contact with water. It
produces caustic soda during such a reaction. Caustic soda is, as the name
implies, a very corrosive substance; a splash into the eye, for example, of a
caustic soda solution may cause blindness within seconds. It is also reactive to
light metals, such as aluminium and magnesium, and is therefore dangerous if
found within aircraft, yet MSC is often provided to passengers. Chlorine is a
highly toxic heavy gas, used in the manufacture of many products, such as
dioxins.
MSC is found in rock deposits in many places throughout the world. Where
close to the surface, its toxicity is such that most plants will die, although a
few specialised species have evolved and can tolerate the presence of the toxin.
They usually do this by exuding it to the surface of the leaves, where the MSC
solidifies into the form of a powder and is blown off or washed off in rain,
enabling the plant to survive.
MSC is soluble in dihydrogen monoxide (see http://www.dhmo.org)
and both substances are found in sea water. MSC is one of the compounds that are
removed from sea water in desalination plants, designed to render it fit for
human consumption as drinking water. Small amounts are frequently found in
bottled mineral water as uncontrolled and undesired impurities. As far as is
known, no government has controlled this undesired toxin in bottled waters.
?
The physiological effects of MSC in humans is partially documented. Small
quantities can be found in all animal tissue and, indeed, may be conside red
as essential to human life. It becomes highly toxic in excess. Short-term
symptoms of excess quantities include a raging thirst, dehydration, especially
of internal organs and the brain, urine retention followed by frequent
micturation, insufficient sudenation, kidney failure and death. Smaller
quantities ingested regularly, such as by regularly eating food contaminated by
MSC, will cause epistaxis, severe hypertension, unbalanced sodium:potassium
ratio in body electrolytes, coronary thrombosis and cerebro-vascular accidents;
either of the last two may result in severe disabilities and death. It is
therefore clear that the presence of added MSC in foodstuffs should be
prohibited by law. Yet something like 1,000,000,000,000 kilograms are produced
annually throughout the world to supply chemical industry plants with raw
material, as well as food producers.
Scientists have not completely resolved this question. It has been shown that
serial killers usually have ingested some MSC in the hours before committing
their crimes, but no proof has been furnished that this is causal.
Popular belief is that taking a pinch of MSC renders one credulous but,
again, without a formal proof of cause and effect.
As far as can be ascertained, there is no scientific proof that it can cause
any form of human cancer. Massive doses of MSC given to laboratory animals have
produced tumours in the stomach. It is hypothesised that there may be a link
between the high rates of stomach cancer and the high intake of MSC in human
food in certain countries, such as Japan. Nevertheless, it may be difficult to
establish an epidemiological relationship because of numerous confounding
factors. However, careful analysis of soft tissue tumours has
revealed the presence of both MSC and DHMO in nearly all types. It has not yet
been established whether one or the other of these substances or, more likely,
the combination of both is causal to the development of the tumour. If it can be
proved that either or both are essential to the development of most types of
cancer cell, then a reduced intake of MSC and DHMO may retard development. Much
research has lately centred on the antioxidant effects of the consumption of a
daily glass or two of red wine to reduce the incidence of cancers. One theory is
that the ethanol in the wine has a certain affinity to DHMO and combines with
it, so that, as the ethanol is eliminated from the body through urination,
respiration and sweating, so it carries with it some of the DHMO, reducing its
toxic effects. On the other hand, excessive consumption of wine may also cause
dehydration of the body tissues (one of the symptoms of a hangover),
exacerbating the toxic effects of MSC.
Monosodium chloride (MSC) should not be confused with monosodium glutamate
(MSG). The latter is hypothesised to be the causal agent of "Chinese
Restaurant Syndrome", resulting in the illness of a proportion of the
population after ingesting food prepared with MSG. Despite both substances having a
common monosodium ion, MSC does not, as far as is known, cause similar symptoms.
On the other hand, excessive use of MSG will cause similar symptoms to MSC, even
in persons who can tolerate it,
thereby showing that a link may occur in the physiological effects of the two
substances.
The answer must be positive but requires qualification. Carnivorous and
omnivorous mammals receive enough MSC from the natural quantities in the food
they eat and they are very intolerant of any added substance. Contrary to human
food products, canned dog and cat foods rarely contain any added MSC or, if they
do, it is only because they are low in animal protein. On the other hand,
herbivorous animals, such as cattle, do need very small quantities in their
diets; wild herbivores may seek out a "salt lick" which will contain some
MSC. Fresh water fish are particularly intolerant of MSC, while creatures living
in the open sea seem fairly tolerant of the quantity of MSC present in the
ocean. A few sea fish migrate into fresh or brackish water to spawn; this is
probably because the fry cannot survive in the presence of MSC and need to
develop a tolerance before they can assume an active life in the sea. Few
animals are tolerant of the MSC in, for example, salt or brine lakes, although a
few species of shrimp seem to have evolved to tolerate the substance.
A few species of birds, such as flamingos, which feed on brine shrimps, also
tolerate relatively high concentrations of MSC, although most species are
totally intolerant of more MSC that is found in their natural diet. Few insects
or arachnoids can tolerate MSC although a few species of butterfly seem to
congregate on damp soil patches with small quantities of MSC present. Slugs and
snails are killed by contact with a small quantity. It is therefore clear that,
whereas a few animals may evolve to tolerate MSC, the vast majority of species
find it toxic in anything more than trace quantities.
Scientists have noted that MSC, if not kept in a tightly sealed, airtight,
container will absorb some dihydrogen monoxide from the atmosphere. This has led
to speculation that it may be useful to reduce the quantity of this other toxin
from the air we breathe by placing MSC filters in air-conditioning plants.
However, this idea has not met with a commercial success because much of the
DHMO has been found in the condensate. However, if DHMO-contaminated MSC is used
in food preparation, both toxins may be present in excess quantities in the
final food product.
In addition, MSC extracted from underground sources and the sea almost
invariably contains concomitant anions and cations. The anions will include
bromides, which are suppressants for the central nervous system, iodides that
can cause hyperactivity of the thyroid gland, fluorides that can cause unsightly
mottling of the teeth, nitrates which are oxydants and so on. The cations are
largely metallic and include such toxic metals as copper, iron, lead, calcium
and potassium. An excess of the last-named will cause blood pressure
disorders.
Worse, some sources of MSC for the food industry are deliberately adulterated
with toxic anions, notably fluorides and iodides.
It is mostly encountered as a white crystalline powder, not dissimilar to
sugar in appearance. If the powder, when viewed under strong magnification, has
a proportion of cubic-shaped crystals, even damaged in form, then suspicions may
be validly aroused. In the absence of the means of chemical analysis, a few
grains taken to the tongue will give a sensation of a pleasant, salty taste.
(Warning: be careful not to repeat this experiment, for fear of an accidental
overdose due to an excess.). There are two simple tests which will almost
certainly, between them, prove the presence of MSC. The presence of the
monosodium ion can be shown by placing a crystal in a blue gas flame. If the gas
flame turns an orange-yellow colour, it shows the presence of sodium. The other
is to dissolve a few grams of the substance in water in a test tube and add an
equal quantity of 5% silver nitrate solution. If MSC is present, a white
precipitate will form. This precipitate will discolour in strong sunlight, after
a few minutes, and can be redissolved by adding a few drops of ammonia or sodium
thiosulfate solution. Note that these reagents are toxic and should be handled
only by persons trained in chemical processes, with suitable protective garments
and goggles, noting the MSDS for each. In solid form, large crystalline lumps
from mines often have a slightly pinkish tinge, although it is believed that
this may be due to impurities of other toxins, such as ferric compounds.
In the chemical industry, the electrolytic decomposition of MSC
is
a principal source of toxic chlorine gas and caustic soda. These substances are
often used for making other toxic compounds. For example, DDT, still used widely
in many countries, carcinogens like epichlorohydrin, used in such household
products as epoxy cements, and highly toxic sodium cyanide, much used in illegal
gold extraction in the Amazon basin and elsewhere, would be almost impossible to
manufacture without MSC.
Many authorities use large quantities of MSC for de-icing roads
in winter, along with a closely allied compound, monocalcium dichloride (MCDC).
The corrosive properties of these two substances cause untold damage to road
vehicles, amounting to millions of dollars annually. In addition, the run-off
from the treated roads
causes pollution of surface water and, in the event of high concentration, may
reduce the bacterial action during sewage treatment, further proof of its toxic
effects on living organisms. It has also been noted that plants on
roadside verges are often killed, because of the spray raised by the tyres of passing
vehicles (note that another closely related compound, monosodium chlorate, has
been used as a general weedkiller or phytocide for many decades). More
enlightened authorities, in many countries, concerned about its toxic effects to
both humans and plants and the damage it causes to material property, have
entirely stopped using MSC and MCDC for deicing, or have drastically reduced its
use.
Incidentally, it has been shown that MSC spray from treated roads will be
carried as an aerosol hundreds of metres and into buildings. Deposits on
sensitive electronic apparati have been known to cause functional errors and
breakdowns, potentially even creating a fire hazard, in the event of a
short-circuit. The mechanism of this is by ionic conduction, which could lead to
the release of highly toxic chlorine gas within the confines of the room.
The food industry is a major consumer of MSC. Many canned or reconstituted
powder soups, for example, may contain it as a flavour enhancer, in proportions
exceeding 1 or even 2 per cent. These products also contain
DHMO in considerable proportions. Meat and fish processing is another major user
as an artificial chemical preservative, along with nitrites. In some countries,
even cheeses are dipped in or rubbed with a DHMO solution of MSC on a daily
basis. Scotsmen and Scotswomen have even been known to add MSC when cooking
their porridge or when making haggises. This may partially explain why Scotland
has one of the highest rates of death due to cardiac disease in the world, with
a considerably lower expectation of life than neighbouring England.
In view of the known toxic and deleterious effects of MSC on the human body,
governments should take immediate action to ban the sale of all foodstuffs containing added MSC and MSC
itself, either pure or
admixed, to the general public . Its
extraction, manufacture and use within the chemical industry should be made
subject to licensing and strict controls as for other toxic substances. In
particular, the use of solutions of MSC in DHMO and their subsequent disposal
should be subject to specific controls. An international treaty forbidding the
use of MSC and MCDC for deicing roads and other surfaces should be promulgated
without delay, for the sake of public health and safety: countries lying wholly
between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn with no roads higher than 2,500
metres would be exempted from signing and ratifying this treaty, provided that
they make an annual report of all MSC use to the
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Health
Organisation (WHO). Attempts should be made to reduce
the MSC and DHMO content of oceans and seas by dilution or any other available
means by all countries with a littoral. In particular, attention is drawn to the
fact that the Dead Sea contains an unusually high MSC:DHMO ratio, which may
explain its name: countries situated within a 500 kilometre radius of the Dead
Sea may wish to take measures to reduce the effects of potential wind-blown
aerosols. The same applies, to a somewhat lesser degree, to some other bodies of
water where chemical analysis shows a high concentration of MSC or where
evaporation has left high concentrations of MSC in salt beds. It is evident that
the abuse of MSC is a severe public health and economic problem, bordering on
disaster levels, and governments are urged to address this issue without delay.
It is suggested that the governments of developed countries may wish to
implement a voluntary gradual phase-down plan by 75% of the reported 2001 levels
of extraction, manufacture and use of MSC by 1 January 2013. Developing
countries may be expected to enact a similar plan by 1 January 2023, the extra
margin being justified that the developed countries have benefited from the use
for a longer period. If such a voluntary plan fails, UNEP and the WHO may take measures to promulgate an international protocol
towards a total ban of the substance. |